Free Da 2166 9 1 PDF Form

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many people make common mistakes that can lead to delays or issues with their evaluation. One frequent error is failing to provide complete and accurate personal information. This includes not only the name but also the Social Security Number or DOD ID, rank, and unit details. Omitting any of this information can result in the form being returned for corrections.

Another common mistake is neglecting the dates. It's essential to ensure that the date of rank and the period covered are filled out correctly. Errors in these dates can misrepresent the evaluation period and affect the overall assessment. Always double-check these entries before submission.

Many individuals also overlook the importance of the rated NCO's email address. This email must be a .gov or .mil address. Providing an incorrect email can hinder communication regarding the evaluation process and may lead to missed notifications or updates.

In Part II, authentication is crucial. Some people forget to include the signatures of both the rater and senior rater. Without these signatures, the evaluation is incomplete. Ensure that all required signatures are present and dated correctly.

Another mistake is failing to include comments in the performance evaluation sections. Each area, such as character, presence, and intellect, requires specific feedback. Leaving these sections blank or providing vague comments can weaken the evaluation and fail to highlight the NCO's strengths or areas for improvement.

Inaccuracies in the APFT and height/weight entries also pose significant issues. If the NCO has failed the APFT or does not meet height/weight standards, comments are mandatory. Neglecting to provide these comments can lead to misunderstandings regarding the NCO's physical readiness.

Some individuals do not take the time to review the completed form before submission. This oversight can result in typos or inaccuracies that could have been easily corrected. A thorough review is essential to ensure all information is accurate and complete.

Finally, failing to understand the appeals process can lead to frustration down the line. The rated NCO must acknowledge that their signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but verifies the accuracy of the administrative data. Understanding this distinction is critical for future reference.

Da 2166 9 1: Usage Steps

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential step in the evaluation process for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). After filling out this form, it will be submitted to the appropriate authority for review. Ensure that all information is accurate and complete to avoid delays in processing.

1. Part I - Administrative Data:
   • Enter your name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide your SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • Indicate your rank.
   • Fill in your date of rank.
   • Input your PMOSC.
   • List your unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
   • Specify your status code.
   • Enter your UIC.
   • State the reason for submission.
   • Indicate the period covered by the evaluation (From/Thru). Include year, month, and day.
   • List the rated months.
   • Provide non-rated codes.
   • Indicate the number of enclosures.
   • Enter your email address (must be .gov or .mil).
2. Part II - Authentication:
   • Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • Have the rater sign the form.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of the rater's signature.
   • Indicate the rater's rank and PMOSC/branch organization duty assignment.
   • Enter the rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
   • Provide the name of the senior rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Enter the senior rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • Have the senior rater sign the form.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of the senior rater's signature.
   • Indicate the senior rater's rank and PMOSC/branch organization duty assignment.
   • Enter the senior rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
   • If applicable, fill in the supplementary reviewer's name, rank, PMOSC/organization duty assignment, and email address.
   • Provide comments from the supplementary reviewer if required.
   • Indicate if the supplementary review is enclosed (Yes/No).
3. Part III - Duty Description (Rater):
   • Enter the principal duty title.
   • Provide the duty MOSC.
   • Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and budget.
   • List areas of special emphasis.
   • Detail appointed duties.
4. Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
   • Record APFT pass/fail/profile date.
   • Provide height and weight, and indicate if within standards.
   • Assess character with comments on adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline.
   • Evaluate presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement with comments.
   • Provide an overall performance rating.
5. Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
   • Select the appropriate box for the rated NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade.
   • List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is primarily used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the Army. A similar document is the DA Form 67-9, which is an Officer Evaluation Report (OER). Like the DA 2166-9-1, the OER assesses the performance and potential of officers, focusing on their leadership abilities and professional competencies. Both forms require input from multiple evaluators, ensuring a comprehensive review of the individual's performance over a specific period. The structure of these forms promotes a standardized approach to evaluation, allowing for consistent feedback across ranks.

To enhance your application process, you may want to utilize a well-crafted comprehensive Recommendation Letter template that effectively highlights your strengths and qualifications. Such a template can streamline the creation of your recommendation letter, ensuring that it meets the required standards for various professional or academic situations.

Another document that shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1 is the DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form. This form is utilized for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and their subordinates. While the DA 2166-9-1 provides a summary of performance over time, the DA Form 4856 focuses on specific instances of behavior or performance. Both documents emphasize the importance of feedback in professional development and require signatures from both the counselor and the counseled individual, fostering accountability and communication.

The DA Form 1059, or the Academic Evaluation Report, is another related document. It is used to evaluate soldiers who complete formal military training courses. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, the DA Form 1059 assesses performance and potential but is specifically tailored for academic achievements. Both forms require detailed descriptions of the individual's performance and contributions, highlighting the importance of both practical and theoretical knowledge in military roles.

The DA Form 2166-9-2 is also noteworthy, as it serves as a follow-up evaluation for NCOs. This form is used for those who have completed a period of evaluation and need a new assessment. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it requires input from a rater and a senior rater, ensuring that the evaluation process remains thorough and multi-faceted. Both forms aim to provide a clear picture of an NCO’s capabilities and readiness for future assignments.

Similarly, the DA Form 2166-9-3 is used for evaluating NCOs in a different grade. It serves a purpose akin to the DA Form 2166-9-1 but is tailored for higher-ranking NCOs. This form also includes sections for rater and senior rater evaluations, maintaining consistency in the evaluation process across different ranks. Both forms emphasize the importance of leadership and performance metrics in assessing an NCO’s readiness for advancement.

The DA Form 7500, known as the Army Civilian Evaluation Report, is another document that parallels the DA Form 2166-9-1. This form evaluates civilian employees within the Army, focusing on their job performance and contributions to the organization. Both documents share a common goal of fostering professional growth and accountability, although the DA Form 7500 is tailored to civilian roles rather than military ones.

Another related document is the DA Form 7000, which is used for evaluating the performance of Army Reserve and National Guard personnel. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, this form assesses the individual’s abilities and potential for future roles. Both forms require detailed input from evaluators and emphasize the importance of leadership and performance in military contexts.

The DA Form 7425, or the Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard, is another document that shares a connection with the DA Form 2166-9-1. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 includes a section for physical fitness evaluations, the DA Form 7425 focuses specifically on the results of physical fitness tests. Both forms highlight the significance of physical readiness in military service and require documentation of performance metrics.

Lastly, the DA Form 2-1, or the Personnel Qualification Record, is another document that serves a complementary role. This form provides a comprehensive overview of a soldier's qualifications, training, and assignments. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses on performance evaluation, the DA Form 2-1 encapsulates the soldier's entire career trajectory, providing context for the evaluations made on the DA 2166-9-1.

When filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form, attention to detail is crucial. Here are some essential dos and don'ts to guide you through the process:

• Do ensure all names are written in the correct order: Last, First, Middle Initial.
• Do double-check the Social Security Number or DOD ID Number for accuracy.
• Do fill in the rank and date of rank completely and correctly.
• Do provide a valid email address that ends in .gov or .mil for the rated NCO and all raters.
• Do verify that all dates are formatted as YYYYMMDD.
• Don't leave any sections blank; if a field does not apply, indicate that clearly.
• Don't forget to sign and date the form where required.
• Don't use abbreviations or acronyms without defining them first.
• Don't submit the form without reviewing it for spelling and grammatical errors.